Comments on: Confronting a Monopolizing Coworker https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/ VitalSmarts is now Crucial Learning Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:46:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Lisa https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-157 Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:46:28 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-157 @Rebecca
Hi, Thank you Rebecca for sharing that you are a reformed “detailed/background giver”…me too! I work in the technical department and most of us on the team are analytical and prefer the full story complete with the boring details. That tendency is part of what makes us good at what we do…but also makes us a bit boring and long winded! It comes as a bit of a shock when you realize that not everyone appreciates the detailed approach and that you are “that guy” holding up the meeting.

]]>
By: Jean https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-156 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:12:03 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-156 I found this topic to be very interesting since I had this problem with a “former” close friend. She talked excessively with too much detail, so much detail, that the main topic or goal of the conversation often was lost. She also hated to be interrupted. I would ask her a question, but ended up “zoning out” because of the excessive detail. I finally realized that it was possible that my friend had Asperger’s Syndrome, a spectrum disorder related to autism. The person with Asperger’s is often very bright and competent in their work, but their lack of social skills and conversational skills can interfere in their personal relationships. Asperger’s can help the person with focus, memory for details/facts and they often have skills in IT and computer work, but have difficulties with personal relationships. Just my two cents!!

]]>
By: Athena https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-155 Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:53:08 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-155 I enjoyed the perspectives from all of the various comments. I think my bottom line is that even crucial conversations should preserve the dignity of each person involved. I think accusatory words are not as effective as getting people involved in shared goals. Conversations can be real and crucial and still be kind.

]]>
By: Malia https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-154 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:25:08 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-154 Simply Do Not Know How mentioned that she and other co-workers had discussed this problem, and apparently there was consensus that the behavior had a negative impact on the team. When approaching the employee, there could be value in letting her know that this isn’t just my concern- others have indicated they have a problem with the behavior as well. If you don’t share that information, the employee could dismiss the conversation as just one person’s perspective. On the other hand, sharing it could have a negative rebound if the employee feels like everyone is talking about her behind her back. What are your thoughts about one person sharing a broader concern and, if approprate, how could/should that be handled?

]]>
By: Rod Morgan https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-153 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:29:57 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-153 Now if someone would explain this technique to David Gregory of NBC News, “Meet the Press” would be able to cover five or six topics instead of two.

]]>
By: Mary Linda https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-152 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:17:30 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-152 Please consider that monopolizing the conversation and pressure of speech (interrupting) are characteristics of Manic Depression. This person may be aware (or not) of their behavior and negative consequences on relationships, but not be aware of how to fix them. Medical intervention may be required. Their reaction to a Crucial Confrontation most likely will be emotional, since Manic Depression is an emotional illness.

Mild Manic Depressives (especially those with rare depression) under a psychiatrists care and stable medication can be a real asset to a company. The company gets a lot of work out of them. I am one of these people.

My supervisor and team leads discussed my problems directly with me but I did not have a clue what they were talking about. I was hurt and responded with lots of tears. Without my supervisor having the courage to get advice from the company medical department and medical giving me a choice of keeping my job or getting help, I honestly did not know I had an illness. I knew something was wrong: people avoided me, cut me off in conversations, and excluded me. My work ethic and quality were excellent, but my relationships were terrible.

I probably have been Manic Depressive since I was born, but now I know what is wrong. I fight to stay on my medications, but I still have to be very careful in meetings not to interrupt and at all times say only what is needed to communicate ideas. And the best blessing: my relationships are better.

]]>
By: Rebecca https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-151 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:03:08 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-151 Dear Simply Do Not Know How,

First, let me state that I am a reformed “detailed, background giver.” Before you get started, you need to acknowledge the value that this team member brings to the team. Often the devil is in the details and background information can provide insight into solving complex problems.

This being said, let me put in my two-cents worth of advice. My reformation started when my manager confronted me in weekly staff meetings. She did it in a most polite way. “Rebecca, I need to know XXX about XXX, can you give me the Cliff Notes version?” Now, it helped that we already had a solid relationship and I do not tend to take things personally. I understood exactly what she was saying. Is there someone who facilitates your meetings? The facilitator should take responsibility to manage the meetings to keep your coworker from monopolizing the conversation. In my case, it was my boss.

Here are some other phrases that may be helpful in keeping your colleague on track:

“I hate to interrupt, but we really need to close this meeting out. Can we pick up on this conversation next time?”

At the beginning of the meeting, open with: “Let’s hold this meeting to one hour. Everyone needs to limit your comments so we can get through the whole agenda.”

There is hope. I am now reformed (and thankful my boss confronted me on this issue). Before I comment, I always ask “How much detail do you need on this issue?” Occassionally, I get overzealous in providing information, so I sometimes have to apologize after the fact (“Sorry everyone, I’m sure that was way more information than you needed”).

Just remember that everyone will be better off if you do confront your colleague. So, just do it!

]]>
By: Athena https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-150 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:16:37 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-150 Here’s a specific example of what would work in my company’s culture:

“I need your help with something. In our last meeting we had ten minutes to cover several of the agenda items. We took about twenty minutes on two of the issues which made the meeting run over by half an hour.We (or “I”, if I am the facilitator or their superior)need each team member’s help to make sure we spend our time well and help everyone stay on schedule for their day. What do you think about limiting the time for responses to each item and keeping the background information to a minimum?”

This puts the emphasis on what a team needs and how each team member can help.

]]>
By: Athena https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-149 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:07:20 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-149 I think more use of the word “we” would be a more true than so many “yous”. I think the point is that the everyone would benefit if the time was kept to the time alloted on the agenda. The colleague who rambles can help by keeping response to the point and shorter. I don’t think crucial conversations have to be as confrontational as the wording in the suggestion would indicate. Just my $.02!

]]>
By: Steve W https://cruciallearning.com/blog/confronting-a-monopolizing-coworker/#comment-148 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:28:07 +0000 http://www.crucialskills.com/?p=172#comment-148 I would find this conversation particularly difficult because I am not sure it is my place to bring this person into line. Shouldn’t the conversation be with the meeting organizer? What do you think?

]]>